Matters are clearly at an early stage with the first payments to investors in the former Woodford Equity Income Fund likely to be made later this month and further payments being made as and when illiquid holdings within the fund are sold off.
The full extent of investors’ losses may not be known for some time.
Hargreaves Lansdown clients
The old adage of financial advice that, “the value of stocks and shares can go up as well as down” is never truer. However, a particularly interesting point in relation to Hargreaves Lansdown clients will be those classes of claimants who have received formal and specific advice to invest in a product and those who invested based on representations within a promoted “wealth list”.
The background into the relationship between the fund itself and the companies that promoted investment will also be crucial – who knew what and when and should they have done anything about it? This brings into play both regulatory and legal issues and ultimately the question of assumption of responsibility.
It will also be interesting to see in due course what the stance of the Financial Ombudsman Service will be – will it get involved in the issue head-on or only from other angles such as continuing fund and management charges and/or delays in transferring out of the investment?
At this stage there are probably more questions than answers but is unlikely to be the last you will hear on the subject.